TABLE SHOWING LOG FRAME
| Hierarchy
| Description | Indicators | Means of Verification (MoV) | Assumptions / Risks & Mitigation |
| Goal / Impact
| Resilient, trafficking-free communities in target border districts with reduced incidence of human trafficking and modern slavery, safe migration pathways, and empowered survivors. | – ≥20% reduction in reported unsafe migration / trafficking cases.
– ≥80% of trained structures active in prevention 12 months post-project. | – National trafficking reports (Ministry of Gender).
– End-line impact evaluation.
– Follow-up survey (12 months post). | Assumption: Government enforcement continues.
Risk: Border instability
Mitigation: Flexible programming, partnerships with district security. |
| Outcome 1 Prevention
| Targeted communities, schools, youth, and transport actors gain and apply practical knowledge and skills to prevent unsafe migration and identify risks early. | – 70% of trained participants apply safe migration / job verification skills.
– 5 new RoC clubs operational with ≥100 members each. | – Pre/post-training surveys.
– 3-month & 12-month follow-ups. – Club registers & activity logs. | Assumption: Community motivation to apply skills.
Risk: Economic desperation
Mitigation: Livelihood linkages & VSLAs. |
| Output 1.1 | Community champions, school patrons, and transport actors recruited, trained, and equipped with AHT & safe migration skills; action plans implemented. | – 20 new champions & 30 transport actors trained.
– 80% action plans executed (monthly dialogues). | – Training attendance records.
– Action plan tracking sheets.
– Quarterly progress reports | Assumption: Availability of local influencers.
Risk: Turnover
Mitigation: Ongoing support & refreshers. |
|
|
Table continuation
| Hierarchy
| Description | Indicators | Means of Verification (MoV) | Assumptions / Risks & Mitigation |
|
Activities under Output 1.1 | 1.1.1 Develop ToR for community champions.
1.1.2 Identify champions via Corps officers.
1.1.3 Recruit champions per ToR.
1.1.4 Train & orient champions on roles & safe migration.
1.1.5 Conduct refresher trainings.
1.1.6 Support champions to implement action plans (dialogues, referrals). | – ToR developed. – 20 new champions recruited & trained.
– 80% action plans active. | – ToR document.
– Recruitment lists.
– Training reports. & certificates.
– Action plan documents & follow-up notes. | Assumption: Corps officers willing to identify candidates.
Risk: Logistical delays
Mitigation: Phased recruitment & training. |
| Output 1.2
| Direct beneficiaries trained as Trainers of Trainers (ToTs) on MSHT trends, child protection, and safe migration; action plans developed. | – 100 ToTs trained across 5 schools & communities.
– 90% with implemented action plans. | – Training certificates.
– Action plan documents.
– Follow-up visit reports. | Assumption: Stakeholder availability.
Risk: Logistical delays
Mitigation: Phased scheduling & MoUs. |
Table: Continuation
| Hierarchy | Description | Indicators | Means of verification
| Assumptions |
| Activities under Output 1.2
| 1.2.1 Identify target schools & communities.
1.2.2 Identify RoC club patrons.
1.2.3 Train patrons & headteachers; develop action plans.
1.2.4 Train local council & elders.
1.2.5 Sensitize parents.
1.2.6 Train government officers.
1.2.7 Train border management officials.
1.2.8 Train Salvation Army officers & local officers per Corps.
1.2.9 Train transport sector officials.
1.2.10 Conduct refresher trainings for ToTs.
| – 100 ToTs trained.
– Action plans developed for 90%. | – Identification reports.
– Training agendas & attendance lists.
– Action plan documents. | Assumption: Partners cooperate.
Risk: Scheduling conflicts
Mitigation: Advance planning & MoUs. |
| Output 1.3
| Rights of Children (RoC) clubs formed and strengthened in 5 target schools. | – 5 clubs with ≥100 members each. – Monthly meetings & exchange activities conducted. | – Club formation minutes. – Activity logs. – Photos & reports. | Assumption: School cooperation. Risk: School disruptions
Mitigation: Signed MoUs & alternative venues. |
Table: Continuation
| Hierarchy | Description | Indicators | Means of verification
| Assumptions |
| Activities under Output 1.3 | 1.3.1 Form RoC clubs in 5 new schools.
1.3.2 Provide training materials (manuals, IEC).
1.3.3 Conduct monthly follow-ups of club meetings.
1.3.4 Organize inter-school exchange learning (football, debates, poems, songs). | – 5 clubs formed.
– Materials distributed.
– Monthly follow-ups completed. | – Formation minutes. – Distribution lists. – Follow-up reports & activity photos. | Assumption: Learners & teachers engaged.
Risk: Low participation.
Mitigation: Incentives & peer-led activities. |
| Outcome 2 Research & Advocacy | Strengthened networks of AHT stakeholders provide multi-agency collaborations for anti-slavery advocacy and response. | – 2 policy briefs influencing national plans.
– ≥10 advocacy platforms engaged. | – Policy documents.
– Symposium reports.
– Advocacy plans. | Assumption: Partner collaboration. Risk: Policy delays
Mitigation: Evidence sharing & diversified platforms. |
| Output 2.1
| Partnerships formalized; advocacy plans developed; research disseminated | – 5 MoUs signed. – 1 annual survey conducted & findings shared. | – Signed MoUs. – Research reports. – Workshop minutes. | Assumption: Stakeholder interest.
Risk: Competing priorities
Mitigation: Joint planning & value proposition. |
Table: Continuation
| Hierarchy | Description | Indicators | Means of verification
| Assumptions |
|
Activities under Output 2.1
| 2.1.1 Hold meetings & workshops with partners. 2.1.2 Develop & sign MoUs with schools & local government. 2.1.3 Engage in national MSHT policy making. 2.1.4 Create advocacy plan based on research gaps. 2.1.5 Provide analysed community information. 2.1.6 Conduct & disseminate annual survey findings. 2.1.7 Identify advocacy platforms. 2.1.8 Identify partners & develop collaboration areas. | – 5 MoUs signed. – 1 survey completed & disseminated. | – Meeting minutes. – Signed MoUs. – Survey reports & dissemination lists. | Assumption: Partners available. Risk: Engagement fatigue Mitigation : Focused, high-value meetings. |
| Outcome 3 Survivor Support
| Victims/survivors supported and linked to safe spaces through partnerships | – 25+ survivors reintegrated with 80% economic resilience.
– Peer networks operational for 20 survivors. | – Case management reports. – Follow-up surveys. | Assumption: Safe environments.
Risk: Re-trafficking
Mitigation: Livelihoods & follow-up. |
Table: Continuation
| Hierarchy | Description | Indicators | Means of verification
| Assumptions |
| Output 3.1
| Service providers mapped; relationships established. | – Updated directory circulated. – 10+ survivors linked to support. | – Directory document. – Referral logs. | Assumption: Provider availability.
Risk: Service gaps
Mitigation: MoUs & regular updates. |
| Activities under Output 3.1
| 3.1.1 Update directory of service providers. 3.1.2 Link survivors to appropriate support. 3.1.3 Develop MoUs with providers (e.g., hospitals). | – Directory updated & circulated. – 10+ linkages completed. | – Updated directory. – Referral & MoU records. | Assumption: Providers cooperative. Risk: Capacity issues Mitigation: Diversified partnerships. |
| M&E Activities
| Conduct mid-line survey; end evaluation; annual audit. | – Surveys & evaluation completed. – Audit findings submitted. | – Survey & evaluation reports. – Audit report. | Assumption: Data access.
Risk: Delays
Mitigation: Timely scheduling & contingency. |
| Exit & Sustainability
| Embed in local structures; produce lessons report; terminate contracts. | – Structures operational post-project. – Lessons report disseminated. | – Exit plan implementation report. – Lessons document. | Assumption: Community ownership.
Risk: Funding gaps
Mitigation: Full integration into Corps & local systems. |
Proposed Budget for Phase III of the Anti-Human Trafficking Project
The Salvation Army Uganda Territory (TSA-Uganda) Project Duration: 2 years.
Period From January 2026 – December 2027
Currency: the currency used for quotation is based on the United States dollars (USD)
This budget is directly derived from the detailed activities and outputs that will be performed by the salvation Amy, to enable it be in position to provide the necessary services to the vulnerable people of the boarder districts in Uganda
The total budget is modest and focused, ensuring high impact and value for donor investment.
BUDGET TABLE
| Budget Category | Detailed Breakdown (Linked to Logframe Activities/Outputs) | Year 1 (USD) | Year 2 (USD) | Total (USD) | % of Total |
| 1.1 Personnel | Project Manager, 2 Field Coordinators, M&E Officer, Admin Support; allowances for Corps officers, chaplains, and local champions (linked to all training, follow-up, and coordination activities) | 48,000 | 50,000 | 98,000 | 29% |
| 1.2 Training & Capacity Building | Workshops & refreshers for 100+ ToTs, 20–30 new champions & transport actors, school patrons, government officers, border officials (Output 1.1 & 1.2 activities 1.1.1–1.1.4, 1.2.1–1.2.10, 1.2.12) | 32,000 | 28,000 | 60,000 | 18% |
| 1.3 Survivor Support & Empowerment | Psychosocial, medical, livelihood/vocational support for 25+ survivors; peer networks & follow-up (Outcome 3, Outputs 3.1 & 3.2 activities 3.1.1–3.1.3, 3.2.1–3.2.5) | 38,000 | 35,000 | 73,000 | 22% |
CONTINUATION TABLE
| Budget Category | Detailed Breakdown (Linked to Log frame Activities/Outputs) | Year 1 (USD) | Year 2 (USD) | Total (USD) | % of Total |
| 1.4 Prevention Materials & Tools | Development/printing of contextualized Job Verification Manual, IEC materials, RoC club manuals, posters, branded items (Output 1.3 & 1.4 activities 1.3.2, 1.4.3, 1.5.1–1.5.4, 1.6.4–1.6.5) | 18,000 | 12,000 | 30,000 | 9% |
| 1.5. Research & Advocacy | Targeted studies, policy briefs, workshops, symposiums, dissemination (Outcome 2, Output 2.1 activities 2.1.1–2.1.8, 2.2.1) | 20,000 | 18,000 | 38,000 | 11% |
| 1.6. Media & Communication | Radio/TV talk shows, social media campaigns, podcasts, live sessions, international day observances (Output 1.6 & 1.7 activities 1.6.1–1.6.5, 1.7.1–1.7.4) | 14,000 | 12,000 | 26,000 | 8% |
| 1.7. Monitoring, Evaluation & Audit | Mid-line survey, end evaluation, annual audit, data tools (M&E Activities) | 10,000 | 12,000 | 22,000 | 7% |
| 1.8. Operating & Admin Costs | Office supplies, utilities, travel/fuel, communication (cross-cutting support for all activities) | 12,000 | 11,000 | 23,000 | 7% |
| 1.9. Contingency (5%) | Inflation, security, emergencies, unforeseen costs | 9,600 | 8,900 | 18,500 | 5% |
| Grand Total | 211,600 | 187,900 | 399,500 | 100% |
KEY BUDGET NOTES
- High Programmatic Focus: 75–78% of the budget is allocated to direct program activities (training, survivor support, materials, research, media), ensuring maximum impact on beneficiaries.
- Leveraging Existing Assets: In-kind contributions from TSA-Uganda (Corps venues, volunteer champions, faith networks) and community resources (VSLAs, sports clubs) significantly reduce cash needs.
- Year-on-Year Reduction: Year 2 costs drop slightly due to one-time setup (like manual development, initial trainings) and increased local ownership/sustainability.
- Value for Money: This modest budget (~$200,000/year average) delivers high reach (20,000 direct + 70,000 indirect beneficiaries), strong sustainability, and measurable results making it an excellent investment for continued donor support.
