Table
| Hierarchy | Description | Indicators | Means of Verification (MoV) | Assumptions / Risks & Mitigation |
| Goal / Impact | Resilient, trafficking-free communities in target border districts with reduced incidence of human trafficking and modern slavery, safe migration pathways, and empowered survivors. | – ≥20% reduction in reported unsafe migration / trafficking cases. – ≥80% of trained structures active in prevention 12 months post-project. | – National trafficking reports (Ministry of Gender). – End-line impact evaluation. – Follow-up survey (12 months post). | Assumption: Government enforcement continues. Risk: Border instability → Mitigation: Flexible programming, partnerships with district security. |
| Outcome 1 Prevention | Targeted communities, schools, youth, and transport actors gain and apply practical knowledge and skills to prevent unsafe migration and identify risks early. | – 70% of trained participants apply safe migration / job verification skills. – 5 new RoC clubs operational with ≥100 members each. | – Pre/post-training surveys. – 3-month & 12-month follow-ups. – Club registers & activity logs. | Assumption: Community motivation to apply skills. Risk: Economic desperation → Mitigation: Livelihood linkages & VSLAs. |
| Output 1.1 | Community champions, school patrons, and transport actors recruited, trained, and equipped with AHT & safe migration skills; action plans implemented. | – 20 new champions & 30 transport actors trained. – 80% action plans executed (e.g., monthly dialogues). | – Training attendance records. – Action plan tracking sheets. – Quarterly progress reports. | Assumption: Availability of local influencers. Risk: Turnover → Mitigation: Ongoing support & refreshers. |
| Activities under Output 1.1 | 1.1.1 Develop ToR for community champions. 1.1.2 Identify champions via Corps officers. 1.1.3 Recruit champions per ToR. 1.1.4 Train & orient champions on roles & safe migration. 1.1.5 Conduct refresher trainings. 1.1.6 Support champions to implement action plans (dialogues, referrals). | – ToR developed. – 20 new champions recruited & trained. – 80% action plans active. | – ToR document. – Recruitment lists. – Training reports & certificates. – Action plan documents & follow-up notes. | Assumption: Corps officers willing to identify candidates. Risk: Logistical delays → Mitigation: Phased recruitment & training. |
| Output 1.2 | Direct beneficiaries trained as Trainers of Trainers (ToTs) on MSHT trends, child protection, and safe migration; action plans developed. | – 100 ToTs trained across 5 schools & communities. – 90% with implemented action plans. | – Training certificates. – Action plan documents. – Follow-up visit reports. | Assumption: Stakeholder availability. Risk: Logistical delays → Mitigation: Phased scheduling & MoUs. |
| Activities under Output 1.2 | 1.2.1 Identify target schools & communities. 1.2.2 Identify RoC club patrons. 1.2.3 Train patrons & headteachers; develop action plans. 1.2.4 Train local council & elders. 1.2.5 Sensitize parents. 1.2.6 Train government officers. 1.2.7 Train border management officials. 1.2.8 Train Salvation Army officers & local officers per Corps. 1.2.9 Train transport sector officials. 1.2.10 Conduct refresher trainings for ToTs. | – 100 ToTs trained. – Action plans developed for 90%. | – Identification reports. – Training agendas & attendance lists. – Action plan documents. | Assumption: Partners cooperate. Risk: Scheduling conflicts → Mitigation: Advance planning & MoUs. |
| Output 1.3 | Rights of Children (RoC) clubs formed and strengthened in 5 target schools. | – 5 clubs with ≥100 members each. – Monthly meetings & exchange activities conducted. | – Club formation minutes. – Activity logs. – Photos & reports. | Assumption: School cooperation. Risk: School disruptions → Mitigation: Signed MoUs & alternative venues. |
| Activities under Output 1.3 | 1.3.1 Form RoC clubs in 5 new schools. 1.3.2 Provide training materials (manuals, IEC). 1.3.3 Conduct monthly follow-ups of club meetings. 1.3.4 Organize inter-school exchange learning (football, debates, poems, songs). | – 5 clubs formed. – Materials distributed. – Monthly follow-ups completed. | – Formation minutes. – Distribution lists. – Follow-up reports & activity photos. | Assumption: Learners & teachers engaged. Risk: Low participation → Mitigation: Incentives & peer-led activities. |
| Outcome 2 Research & Advocacy | Strengthened networks of AHT stakeholders provide multi-agency collaborations for anti-slavery advocacy and response. | – 2 policy briefs influencing national plans. – ≥10 advocacy platforms engaged. | – Policy documents. – Symposium reports. – Advocacy plans. | Assumption: Partner collaboration. Risk: Policy delays → Mitigation: Evidence sharing & diversified platforms. |
| Output 2.1 | Partnerships formalized; advocacy plans developed; research disseminated. | – 5 MoUs signed. – 1 annual survey conducted & findings shared. | – Signed MoUs. – Research reports. – Workshop minutes. | Assumption: Stakeholder interest. Risk: Competing priorities → Mitigation: Joint planning & value proposition. |
| Activities under Output 2.1 | 2.1.1 Hold meetings & workshops with partners. 2.1.2 Develop & sign MoUs with schools & local government. 2.1.3 Engage in national MSHT policy making. 2.1.4 Create advocacy plan based on research gaps. 2.1.5 Provide analyzed community information. 2.1.6 Conduct & disseminate annual survey findings. 2.1.7 Identify advocacy platforms. 2.1.8 Identify partners & develop collaboration areas.
| – 5 MoUs signed. – 1 survey completed & disseminated. | – Meeting minutes. – Signed MoUs. – Survey reports & dissemination lists. | Assumption: Partners available. Risk: Engagement fatigue → Mitigation: Focused, high-value meetings. |
| Outcome 3 Survivor Support | Victims/survivors supported and linked to safe spaces through partnerships. | – 25+ survivors reintegrated with 80% economic resilience. – Peer networks operational for 20 survivors. | – Case management reports. – Follow-up surveys. | Assumption: Safe environments. Risk: Re-trafficking → Mitigation: Livelihoods & follow-up. |
| Output 3.1 | Service providers mapped; relationships established. | – Updated directory circulated. – 10+ survivors linked to support. | – Directory document. – Referral logs. | Assumption: Provider availability. Risk: Service gaps → Mitigation: MoUs & regular updates. |
| Activities under Output 3.1 | 3.1.1 Update directory of service providers. 3.1.2 Link survivors to appropriate support. 3.1.3 Develop MoUs with providers (e.g., hospitals). | – Directory updated & circulated. – 10+ linkages completed. | – Updated directory. – Referral & MoU records. | Assumption: Providers cooperative. Risk: Capacity issues → Mitigation: Diversified partnerships. |
| M&E Activities | Conduct mid-line survey; end evaluation; annual audit. | – Surveys & evaluation completed. – Audit findings submitted. | – Survey & evaluation reports. – Audit report. | Assumption: Data access. Risk: Delays → Mitigation: Timely scheduling & contingency. |
| Exit & Sustainability | Embed in local structures; produce lessons report; terminate contracts. | – Structures operational post-project. – Lessons report disseminated. | – Exit plan implementation report. – Lessons document. | Assumption: Community ownership. Risk: Funding gaps → Mitigation: Full integration into Corps & local systems. |
