HierarchyDescriptionIndicatorsMeans of Verification (MoV)Assumptions / Risks & MitigationGoal / ImpactResilient, trafficking-free communities in target border districts with reduced incidence of human trafficking and modern slavery, safe migration pathways, and empowered survivors.- ≥20% reduction in reported unsafe migration / trafficking cases. – ≥80% of trained structures active in prevention 12 months post-project.- National trafficking reports. – End-line impact evaluation. – Follow-up survey (12 months post).Assumption: Government enforcement continues. Risk: Border instability → Mitigation: Flexible scheduling, partnerships with district security.Outcome 1 PreventionTargeted communities, schools, youth, and transport actors gain and apply practical knowledge and skills to prevent unsafe migration and identify risks early.- 70% of trained participants apply safe migration / job verification skills. – 5 new RoC clubs operational with ≥100 members each.- Pre/post-training surveys. – 3-month & 12-month follow-ups. – Club registers & activity logs.Assumption: Community motivation to apply skills. Risk: Economic desperation → Mitigation: Livelihood linkages & VSLAs.Output 1.1Community champions, school patrons, and transport actors recruited, trained, and equipped with AHT & safe migration skills; action plans implemented.- 20 new champions & 30 transport actors trained. – 80% action plans executed (e.g., monthly dialogues).- Training attendance records. – Action plan tracking sheets. – Quarterly progress reports.Assumption: Availability of local influencers. Risk: Turnover → Mitigation: Ongoing support & refresher trainings.Activities under Output 1.11.1.1 Develop Terms of Reference (ToR) for community champions. 1.1.2 Use Corps officers & command heads to identify suitable champions. 1.1.3 Recruit champions per ToR. 1.1.4 Train & orient recruited champions on project activities, safe migration, job verification, and roles. 1.1.5 Conduct refresher trainings for existing champions. 1.1.6 Support champions to develop & implement individual action plans (monthly dialogues, early warning, referrals).- ToR developed. – 20 new champions recruited & trained. – 80% action plans active.- ToR document. – Recruitment lists. – Training reports & certificates. – Action plan documents & follow-up notes.Assumption: Corps officers willing to identify candidates. Risk: Logistical delays → Mitigation: Phased recruitment & training.Output 1.2Direct beneficiaries (schools, communities, government officers) trained as Trainers of Trainers (ToTs) on MSHT trends, child protection, and safe migration; action plans developed.- 100 ToTs trained across 5 schools & communities. – 90% with implemented action plans.- Training certificates. – Action plan documents. – Follow-up visit reports.Assumption: Stakeholder availability. Risk: Logistical delays → Mitigation: Phased scheduling & MoUs.Activities under Output 1.21.2.1 Identify target schools & communities. 1.2.2 Identify RoC club patrons. 1.2.3 Train club patrons & headteachers; develop action plans. 1.2.4 Train local council & elders. 1.2.5 Sensitize parents. 1.2.6 Train relevant government officers. 1.2.7 Train border management committee officials. 1.2.8 Train Salvation Army officers & 3 local officers per Corps. 1.2.9 Train transport sector officials (boda-boda, taxi, truck associations). 1.2.10 Conduct refresher trainings for ToTs (champions, taskforce members).- 100 ToTs trained. – Action plans developed for 90%.- Identification reports. – Training agendas & attendance lists. – Action plan documents.Assumption: Partners cooperate. Risk: Scheduling conflicts → Mitigation: Advance planning & MoUs.Output 1.3Rights of Children (RoC) clubs formed and strengthened in 5 target schools.- 5 clubs with ≥100 members each. – Monthly meetings & exchange activities conducted.- Club formation minutes. – Activity logs. – Photos & reports.Assumption: School cooperation. Risk: School disruptions → Mitigation: Signed MoUs & alternative venues.Activities under Output 1.31.3.1 Form RoC clubs in 5 new schools. 1.3.2 Provide training materials (manuals, IEC materials). 1.3.3 Conduct monthly follow-ups of club meetings. 1.3.4 Organize inter-school exchange learning (football competitions, debates, poems, songs).- 5 clubs formed. – Materials distributed. – Monthly follow-ups completed.- Formation minutes. – Distribution lists. – Follow-up reports & activity photos.Assumption: Learners & teachers engaged. Risk: Low participation → Mitigation: Incentives & peer-led activities.Outcome 2 Research & AdvocacyStrengthened networks of AHT stakeholders provide multi-agency collaborations for anti-slavery advocacy and response.- 2 policy briefs influencing national plans. – ≥10 advocacy platforms engaged.- Policy documents. – Symposium reports. – Advocacy plans.Assumption: Partner collaboration. Risk: Policy delays → Mitigation: Evidence sharing & diversified platforms.Output 2.1Partnerships formalized; advocacy plans developed; research disseminated.- 5 MoUs signed. – 1 annual survey conducted & findings shared.- Signed MoUs. – Research reports. – Workshop minutes.Assumption: Stakeholder interest. Risk: Competing priorities → Mitigation: Joint planning & clear value proposition.Activities under Output 2.12.1.1 Hold meetings & workshops with partners. 2.1.2 Develop & sign MoUs with schools & local government. 2.1.3 Engage in national MSHT policy making. 2.1.4 Create advocacy plan based on research gaps. 2.1.5 Provide analyzed information from community work. 2.1.6 Conduct & disseminate annual survey findings. 2.1.7 Identify advocacy platforms. 2.1.8 Identify partners & develop collaboration areas.- 5 MoUs signed. – 1 survey completed & disseminated.- Meeting minutes. – Signed MoUs. – Survey reports & dissemination lists.Assumption: Partners available. Risk: Engagement fatigue → Mitigation: Focused, high-value meetings.Outcome 3 Survivor SupportVictims/survivors supported and linked to safe spaces through partnerships.- 25+ survivors reintegrated with 80% economic resilience. – Peer networks operational for 20 survivors.- Case management reports. – Follow-up surveys.Assumption: Safe environments. Risk: Re-trafficking → Mitigation: Livelihoods & follow-up.Output 3.1Service providers mapped; relationships established.- Updated directory circulated. – 10+ survivors linked to support.- Directory document. – Referral logs.Assumption: Provider availability. Risk: Service gaps → Mitigation: MoUs & regular updates.Activities under Output 3.13.1.1 Update directory of service providers. 3.1.2 Link survivors to appropriate support. 3.1.3 Develop MoUs with providers (e.g., hospitals).- Directory updated & circulated. – 10+ linkages completed.- Updated directory. – Referral & MoU records.Assumption: Providers cooperative. Risk: Capacity issues → Mitigation: Diversified partnerships.M&E ActivitiesConduct mid-line survey; end evaluation; annual audit.- Surveys & evaluation completed. – Audit findings submitted.- Survey & evaluation reports. – Audit report.Assumption: Data access. Risk: Delays → Mitigation: Timely scheduling & contingency.Exit & SustainabilityEmbed in local structures; produce lessons report; terminate contracts.- Structures operational post-project. – Lessons report disseminated.- Exit plan implementation report. – Lessons document.Assumption: Community ownership. Risk: Funding gaps → Mitigation: Full integration into Corps & local systems.
