Research consultancy
CHAPTER THREE: MATERIALS AND METHODS
3.1 Data Collection Procedure
To achieve the first objective of the study—identifying the common antibiotics used in poultry farms within Nakawa Division—a structured questionnaire was employed. Data was collected from 50 respondents, comprising employees from five purposively selected poultry farms, with 10 participants from each farm.
Sample Questionnaire Excerpt
Dear Respondents,
I am MUGARURA GASTON, a postgraduate student at Kyambogo University, pursuing a Master’s degree in Chemistry. I am conducting research titled “Determination of Antibiotic Residues in Chicken Meat.” This study is a partial requirement for the award of the Master’s degree. All information provided will be treated with strict confidentiality and is solely intended for academic purposes.
Part I: Bio Data
(Please tick the appropriate option)
Gender: Male / Female
Age Group: 20–29 / 30–39 / 40–49 / 50–59 years
Marital Status: Single / Married / Widowed
Education Level: Certificate / Diploma / Degree / Masters
Duration of Employment at This Farm: <1 year / 2–4 years / >5 years
Name of the Farm: ___________________________
Part II: Common Antibiotics Used
Respondents were asked to indicate which antibiotics are commonly used on their farms and answer related questions.
Which of the following antibiotics are used on this farm?
Antibiotic | Yes | No |
---|---|---|
Tetracycline | ||
Oxytetracycline | ||
Enrofloxacin | ||
Penicillin | ||
Chloramphenicol | ||
Other (specify): ____________________________ |
Who administers these antibiotics?
Personnel | Yes | No |
---|---|---|
Myself | ||
Veterinary doctor | ||
Farm staff |
Source of Antibiotics
Source | Yes | No |
---|---|---|
Veterinary doctor | ||
Veterinary drug shop | ||
Hawkers | ||
Other (specify): ____________________________ |
Reasons for Using Antibiotics
Reason | Yes | No |
---|---|---|
Easy accessibility | ||
Treating sick birds | ||
Low cost | ||
High effectiveness | ||
Ease of administration |
3.2 Sample Collection
Fresh tissue samples (breast muscle, liver, and gizzard) from a total of 50 broilers were randomly obtained from various markets within Nakawa Division—namely Nakawa, Bugolobi, Luzira, Ntinda, and Banda. Nakawa Division is located in Kampala Capital City Authority with coordinates 0°20’00.0″N, 32°37’00.0″E (UBOS, 2014).
Samples were sealed in sterile, labeled polyethylene bags at ambient temperature, then transported to the Directorate of Government Analytical Laboratory (DGAL) in Wandegeya, Kampala. Upon arrival, samples were refrigerated at 4°C.
3.3 Equipment Used
The laboratory equipment used included:
Laboratory Blender (Thomas Scientific, USA)
Vortex Mixer VM18 (Schiltern Scientific, UK)
Centrifuge (Hettich D-78532, Germany)
Nitrogen Evaporator – 6 Position N-Evap (Thomas Scientific, USA)
LC-MS software: MassHunter Workstation (Version B.08.00) and Quantitative Analysis (Version B.07.01)
3.4 Sample Preparation
A total of 150 tissue samples (liver, breast, and gizzard) were blended individually using the laboratory blender to create finely minced samples. Each minced sample (4 g) was stored at -18°C until further analysis.
3.5 Chemicals
All reagents and chemicals used were of at least 99% HPLC-grade purity. These included:
Methanol (Merck, Germany)
Trichloroacetic acid (TCA)
Diethyl ether
Acetone
3.6 Preparation of Standards
USP-certified reference standards were used, including:
Enrofloxacin (ENR)
Oxytetracycline (OTC)
Tetracycline (TC)
Penicillin G
Chloramphenicol (CAP)
Each standard was prepared by dissolving 0.1 g of the powdered compound in 4 mL of methanol and stored at -4°C.
3.7 Sample Extraction
Minced samples were kept at -4°C for one hour. If not analyzed within two days, samples were preserved at -18°C. To ensure sample integrity, 50 µL of multiresidue internal standards were added to 4 g of each sample.
Following Poppelka (2005), extraction was conducted as follows:
4 g of minced sample + 10 mL phosphate buffer saline (pH 6.5) + 2 mL 30% TCA
Vortexed and centrifuged at 4000 rpm for 20 min
Supernatant filtered using 50 µm Whatman filter paper
2 mL diethyl ether added; repeated twice
Final filtrate collected in screw-cap vials and refrigerated
Evaporation was done at 40°C in a water bath under nitrogen flow to dryness.
3.8 Sample Analysis
The dry residue was reconstituted in a 1 mL solution of water/methanol/acetonitrile (50:25:25) with 0.05% acetic acid and vortexed. Filtrate was placed in LC-MS vials and analyzed using an LC-MS system.
Analysis was performed using an Eclipse Plus C18 column (Agilent Technologies):
Column dimensions: 2.1 mm ID × 100 mm length
Particle size: 1.8 µm, Pore size: 95
Temperature: 30°C
Flow rate: 0.5 mL/min; Injection volume: 10 µL
Mobile phases: (A) water, (B) acetonitrile
Gradient: 10% B → 65% B → 95% B → back to 10% B in 12 minutes
For other residues:
Temp: 40°C, Flow rate: 0.3 mL/min
Mobile phases: (A) 0.1% TFA in water, (B) acetonitrile
Gradient run time: 15 minutes (A: 90% → 25% → 90%)
Chromatographic separation and detection allowed quantification of antibiotics present in the samples.
3.9 Data Analysis
Data on antibiotic concentrations were analyzed using SPSS (Statistical Package for the Social Sciences). Analysis of Variance (ANOVA) was applied to compare the concentration of antibiotic residues across the different tissues (breast, liver, and gizzard).