TABLE OF CONTENTS
Contents
(E) CONCLUSION AND RECOMMENDATIONS ON FINDINGS, HYPOTHESIS BY HYPOTHESIS 11
QUESTION A
- Study problem
In the analysis of the performance of students it has been revealed that there is a constant failure by the students to pass their exams with good marks as expected. The poor performance by the students therefore has warranted the researcher to investigate into the influence of age, study sessions on academic performance.
- Purpose of the study
The purpose of the study is to investigate into influence of age, study sessions on academic performance.
- Objectives of the study
To analyze the relationship between age of the student with academic performance
To investigate the age of the student on academic performance.
To examine the relationship between study sessions and academic performance.
- Hypothesis
There is no relationship between age of the student and academic performance.
Study sessions has no significant relationship with academic performance.
QUESTION B
- Respondents by study sessions
Steps in entering data
Opening SPSS TYPING “SESSIONS” IN NAME COLUMNS, “NUMERIC” ON TYPE
LABEL = STUDY SESSIONS
VALUE = 1 DAY, 2=EVENING
MEASURE = NORMINAL
VIEW OF THE SESSIONS BEING ENTERED IN SPSS
Frequencies and valid percentages for study sessions
| Study | Frequency | Valid Percent |
| DAY | 6 | 60.0 |
| EVENING | 4 | 40.0 |
| Total | 10 | 100.0 |
- II) RESPODENTS BY AGE
THE SPSS view of the data which has been entered of age of the respondents
STEPS THAT WAS FOLLOWED
NAME= AGE
TYPE=NUMERIC
LABEL = AGE IN YEARS
MEASURE = ORDINAL
| Descriptive Statistics | |||||
| N | Minimum | Maximum | Mean | Std. Deviation | |
| AGE IN YEARS | 10 | 26 | 50 | 38.00 | 7.616 |
| Valid N (listwise) | 10 | ||||
The mean age was 38 while the standard deviation was 7.616
- Respondents by academic performance
STEPS THAT WAS FOLLOWED
NAME = AGE
TYPE =NUMERIC
LABEL = AGE IN YEARS
MEASURE = ORDINAL
| Descriptive Statistics | |||||
| N | Minimum | Maximum | Mean | Std. Deviation | |
| PERCENTAGE SCORE | 10 | 41 | 74 | 61.90 | 10.170 |
| Valid N (listwise) | 10 | ||||
It can be observed from the findings that the mean percentage score was 61.90 while the standard deviation was 10.170.
QUESTION C
- Hypothesis
Study session’s have significant effect on academic performance
Study sessions do not have significant relationship on academic performance
- Statistical tool
The study will use ANOVA (Analysis of variance)
- Scatter graph
The steps included
CHART BUILDER
SCATTER GRAPH
SIMPLE SCATTER GRAPH
Then enter the variables study sessions and academic performance\
SCATTER GRAPH
From the scatter graph it is evident that there is relationship between study sessions and academic performance.
- ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE (ANOVA)
| ANOVAa | ||||||
| Model | Sum of Squares | df | Mean Square | F | Sig. | |
| 1 | Regression | .067 | 1 | .067 | .001 | .981b |
| Residual | 930.833 | 8 | 116.354 | |||
| Total | 930.900 | 9 | ||||
| a. Dependent Variable: PERCENTAGE SCORE | ||||||
| b. Predictors: (Constant), STUDY SESSION | ||||||
Findings from the table above indicates that the P-value 0.981 indicates there is insignificant relationship between study relationship and academic performance.
- Interpretation of results
These findings in the study therefore indicates that there is no relationship between study session and academic performance.
QUESTION D
- Hypotheses
H1 : There is a significant relationship between age and academic performance
H2 ; Age does not affect academic performance
(ii) Statistical tool
The study will use Pearson product moment correlation analysis
(iii) Scatter graph
The graph shows that there is a weak relationship between age and academic performance of the students.
- IBM SPSS
Steps
Analyze correlation Bivariate variables ok
| Correlations | |||
| AGE IN YEARS | PERCENTAGE SCORE | ||
| AGE IN YEARS | Pearson Correlation | 1 | -.318 |
| Sig. (2-tailed) | .370 | ||
| N | 10 | 10 | |
| PERCENTAGE SCORE | Pearson Correlation | -.318 | 1 |
| Sig. (2-tailed) | .370 | ||
| N | 10 | 10 | |
The table results indicates that P-Value (0.370>0.05) the results indicates that there is no significant relationship between age and performance score of students.
(V) Interpretation of the results
According to the table above the Pearson rank correlation coefficient = -0.318 indicating that there is a weak negative relationship between age of students and the performance score.
(E) CONCLUSION AND RECOMMENDATIONS ON FINDINGS, HYPOTHESIS BY HYPOTHESIS
(i) Conclusion
On regarding the hypothesis of
- There is statistically significant relationship between study sessions and performance score
There is insignificant relationship between study sessions and performance score
- Age affects performance score of the students.
There is insignificant relationship between age and academic performance. This analysis further shows that the age of the students does not matter on the performance score of the students.
(i) Recommendations
The school should provide a good learning environment.
The school should also provide the necessary facilities that facilitates learning.
Students should be admitted regardless of their age.
Whether day or evening students should be admitted to study.