Table showing log frame
| Hierarchy
| Description | Indicators | Means of Verification (MoV) | Assumptions / Risks & Mitigation |
| Goal / Impact
| Resilient, trafficking-free communities in target border districts with reduced incidence of human trafficking and modern slavery, safe migration pathways, and empowered survivors. | – ≥20% reduction in reported unsafe migration / trafficking cases.
– ≥80% of trained structures active in prevention 12 months post-project. | – National trafficking reports (Ministry of Gender).
– End-line impact evaluation.
– Follow-up survey (12 months post). | Assumption: Government enforcement continues.
Risk: Border instability
Mitigation: Flexible programming, partnerships with district security. |
| Outcome 1 Prevention
| Targeted communities, schools, youth, and transport actors gain and apply practical knowledge and skills to prevent unsafe migration and identify risks early. | – 70% of trained participants apply safe migration / job verification skills.
– 5 new RoC clubs operational with ≥100 members each. | – Pre/post-training surveys.
– 3-month & 12-month follow-ups. – Club registers & activity logs. | Assumption: Community motivation to apply skills.
Risk: Economic desperation
Mitigation: Livelihood linkages & VSLAs. |
| Output 1.1 | Community champions, school patrons, and transport actors recruited, trained, and equipped with AHT & safe migration skills; action plans implemented. | – 20 new champions & 30 transport actors trained.
– 80% action plans executed (monthly dialogues). | – Training attendance records.
– Action plan tracking sheets.
– Quarterly progress reports | Assumption: Availability of local influencers.
Risk: Turnover
Mitigation: Ongoing support & refreshers. |
|
|
| Hierarchy
| Description | Indicators | Means of Verification (MoV) | Assumptions / Risks & Mitigation |
|
Activities under Output 1.1 | 1.1.1 Develop ToR for community champions.
1.1.2 Identify champions via Corps officers.
1.1.3 Recruit champions per ToR.
1.1.4 Train & orient champions on roles & safe migration.
1.1.5 Conduct refresher trainings.
1.1.6 Support champions to implement action plans (dialogues, referrals). | – ToR developed. – 20 new champions recruited & trained.
– 80% action plans active. | – ToR document.
– Recruitment lists.
– Training reports. & certificates.
– Action plan documents & follow-up notes. | Assumption: Corps officers willing to identify candidates.
Risk: Logistical delays
Mitigation: Phased recruitment & training. |
| Output 1.2
| Direct beneficiaries trained as Trainers of Trainers (ToTs) on MSHT trends, child protection, and safe migration; action plans developed. | – 100 ToTs trained across 5 schools & communities.
– 90% with implemented action plans. | – Training certificates.
– Action plan documents.
– Follow-up visit reports. | Assumption: Stakeholder availability.
Risk: Logistical delays
Mitigation: Phased scheduling & MoUs. |
Table: Continuation
| Hierarchy | Description | Indicators | Means of verification
| Assumptions |
| Activities under Output 1.2
| 1.2.1 Identify target schools & communities.
1.2.2 Identify RoC club patrons.
1.2.3 Train patrons & headteachers; develop action plans.
1.2.4 Train local council & elders.
1.2.5 Sensitize parents.
1.2.6 Train government officers.
1.2.7 Train border management officials.
1.2.8 Train Salvation Army officers & local officers per Corps.
1.2.9 Train transport sector officials.
1.2.10 Conduct refresher trainings for ToTs.
| – 100 ToTs trained.
– Action plans developed for 90%. | – Identification reports.
– Training agendas & attendance lists.
– Action plan documents. | Assumption: Partners cooperate.
Risk: Scheduling conflicts
Mitigation: Advance planning & MoUs. |
| Output 1.3
| Rights of Children (RoC) clubs formed and strengthened in 5 target schools. | – 5 clubs with ≥100 members each. – Monthly meetings & exchange activities conducted. | – Club formation minutes. – Activity logs. – Photos & reports. | Assumption: School cooperation. Risk: School disruptions
Mitigation: Signed MoUs & alternative venues. |
Table: Continuation
| Hierarchy | Description | Indicators | Means of verification
| Assumptions |
| Activities under Output 1.3 | 1.3.1 Form RoC clubs in 5 new schools.
1.3.2 Provide training materials (manuals, IEC).
1.3.3 Conduct monthly follow-ups of club meetings.
1.3.4 Organize inter-school exchange learning (football, debates, poems, songs). | – 5 clubs formed.
– Materials distributed.
– Monthly follow-ups completed. | – Formation minutes. – Distribution lists. – Follow-up reports & activity photos. | Assumption: Learners & teachers engaged.
Risk: Low participation.
Mitigation: Incentives & peer-led activities. |
| Outcome 2 Research & Advocacy | Strengthened networks of AHT stakeholders provide multi-agency collaborations for anti-slavery advocacy and response. | – 2 policy briefs influencing national plans.
– ≥10 advocacy platforms engaged. | – Policy documents.
– Symposium reports.
– Advocacy plans. | Assumption: Partner collaboration. Risk: Policy delays
Mitigation: Evidence sharing & diversified platforms. |
| Output 2.1
| Partnerships formalized; advocacy plans developed; research disseminated | – 5 MoUs signed. – 1 annual survey conducted & findings shared. | – Signed MoUs. – Research reports. – Workshop minutes. | Assumption: Stakeholder interest.
Risk: Competing priorities
Mitigation: Joint planning & value proposition. |
|
|
Table: Continuation
| Hierarchy | Description | Indicators | Means of verification
| Assumptions |
|
Activities under Output 2.1
| 2.1.1 Hold meetings & workshops with partners. 2.1.2 Develop & sign MoUs with schools & local government. 2.1.3 Engage in national MSHT policy making. 2.1.4 Create advocacy plan based on research gaps. 2.1.5 Provide analysed community information. 2.1.6 Conduct & disseminate annual survey findings. 2.1.7 Identify advocacy platforms. 2.1.8 Identify partners & develop collaboration areas. | – 5 MoUs signed. – 1 survey completed & disseminated. | – Meeting minutes. – Signed MoUs. – Survey reports & dissemination lists. | Assumption: Partners available. Risk: Engagement fatigue Mitigation : Focused, high-value meetings. |
| Outcome 3 Survivor Support
| Victims/survivors supported and linked to safe spaces through partnerships | – 25+ survivors reintegrated with 80% economic resilience.
– Peer networks operational for 20 survivors. | – Case management reports. – Follow-up surveys. | Assumption: Safe environments.
Risk: Re-trafficking
Mitigation: Livelihoods & follow-up. |
Table: Continuation
| Hierarchy | Description | Indicators | Means of verification
| Assumptions |
| Output 3.1
| Service providers mapped; relationships established. | – Updated directory circulated. – 10+ survivors linked to support. | – Directory document. – Referral logs. | Assumption: Provider availability.
Risk: Service gaps
Mitigation: MoUs & regular updates. |
| Activities under Output 3.1
| 3.1.1 Update directory of service providers. 3.1.2 Link survivors to appropriate support. 3.1.3 Develop MoUs with providers (e.g., hospitals). | – Directory updated & circulated. – 10+ linkages completed. | – Updated directory. – Referral & MoU records. | Assumption: Providers cooperative. Risk: Capacity issues Mitigation: Diversified partnerships. |
| M&E Activities
| Conduct mid-line survey; end evaluation; annual audit. | – Surveys & evaluation completed. – Audit findings submitted. | – Survey & evaluation reports. – Audit report. | Assumption: Data access.
Risk: Delays
Mitigation: Timely scheduling & contingency. |
| Exit & Sustainability
| Embed in local structures; produce lessons report; terminate contracts. | – Structures operational post-project. – Lessons report disseminated. | – Exit plan implementation report. – Lessons document. | Assumption: Community ownership.
Risk: Funding gaps
Mitigation: Full integration into Corps & local systems. |
|
|
