methodology example
CHAPTER THREE: METHODOLOGY
3.0 Introduction
This chapter outlines the methodology employed in the study, covering the research design, area of study, study population, sample size and selection, sampling techniques, data collection methods, quality control of data instruments, data collection procedures, and the limitations of the study.
3.1 Research Design
A descriptive research design was utilized for this study. This design was chosen as it effectively captures participants’ perspectives on the impact of technology on the efficiency of accounting practices. It provided comprehensive information necessary to address the research questions. The descriptive approach was deemed suitable because the study aimed to conduct a detailed analysis of the gathered data.
3.2 Area of Study
The research was conducted at Equity Bank, located at Oasis Mall, Kampala, Uganda.
3.3 Study Population and Sample Size
The study targeted employees in various roles, including procurement staff, accounting officers, information technology officers, and administrative personnel, comprising a total of 43 individuals.
3.4 Sampling Techniques
According to Amin (2005), sampling involves selecting a portion of the population in such a way that each sample of the same size has an equal chance of being chosen. A sample of 30 respondents was selected, including 3 from the procurement department, 10 from administration, 10 from information technology, and 7 from accounting. Purposive sampling was applied to these different categories of respondents.
The table below summarizes the sample size and sampling techniques used in the study.
Table: Sample Size of the Respondents
| Population Category | Total Population | Sample Size |
|---|---|---|
| Accounting Officers | 15 | 10 |
| Administration | 15 | 10 |
| Procurement and Disposal Unit | 3 | 3 |
| Information Technology | 10 | 7 |
| Total | 43 | 30 |
3.5 Data Collection Methods
Data for the study was collected from both primary and secondary sources.
(a) Primary Data
Primary data was obtained through questionnaires administered to the selected respondents to capture their opinions and practices regarding the role of computerized accounting in organizational performance.
3.6 Data Collection Instruments
The primary instruments for data collection were questionnaires and an interview guide. Surveys played a key role in gathering data and were part of a broader evaluation strategy. The main data collection method was the survey, facilitated by tools such as questionnaires. The questionnaires allowed respondents adequate time to understand and answer the questions accurately.
3.6.1 Questionnaires
Questionnaires were used to collect quantitative data. The researcher administered these questionnaires to respondents across various departments, including procurement, administration, information technology, and accounting. The questionnaires were structured based on the study’s objectives and research questions. Respondents completed the questionnaires independently, and the close-ended nature of the questions ensured the respondents could provide candid and anonymous responses.
3.7 Data Collection Procedures
Upon receiving approval from the university to conduct the study, the researcher visited the study area for familiarization. Permission was sought from the staff, and once granted, questionnaires were distributed, and interviews were conducted with selected participants.
3.8 Quality Control of Data Instruments
The research instruments were reviewed by the supervisor to ensure accuracy. A pilot study was also conducted to verify whether the instruments measured what they were intended to.
3.9 Data Processing and Analysis
The raw data collected was coded, edited, and organized for analysis. Only fully completed questionnaires were analyzed, with the data presented using statistical tables and graphs.
